The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rehabilitation of Memory following Brain Injury (ReMemBrIn): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-16-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roshan das Nair, Nadina B Lincoln, Deborah Ftizsimmons, Nicola Brain, Alan Montgomery, Lucy Bradshaw, Avril Drummond, Catherine Sackley, Gavin Newby, Jim Thornton, Sandip Stapleton, Anthony Pink |
| Abstract |
Impairments of memory are commonly reported by people with traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Such deficits are persistent, debilitating, and can severely impact quality of life. Currently, many do not routinely receive follow-up appointments for residual memory problems following discharge. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 19% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,462,037
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#45
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,110
of 361,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#8
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.