↓ Skip to main content

Genomic basis of broad host range and environmental adaptability of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 and Rhizobium sp. PRF 81 which are used in inoculants for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic basis of broad host range and environmental adaptability of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 and Rhizobium sp. PRF 81 which are used in inoculants for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-735
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernesto Ormeño-Orrillo, Pâmela Menna, Luiz Gonzaga P Almeida, Francisco Javier Ollero, Marisa Fabiana Nicolás, Elisete Pains Rodrigues, Andre Shigueyoshi Nakatani, Jesiane Stefânia Silva Batista, Ligia Maria Oliveira Chueire, Rangel Celso Souza, Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos, Manuel Megías, Mariangela Hungria, Esperanza Martínez-Romero

Abstract

Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 and Rhizobium sp. PRF 81 are α-Proteobacteria that establish nitrogen-fixing symbioses with a range of legume hosts. These strains are broadly used in commercial inoculants for application to common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in South America and Africa. Both strains display intrinsic resistance to several abiotic stressful conditions such as low soil pH and high temperatures, which are common in tropical environments, and to several antimicrobials, including pesticides. The genetic determinants of these interesting characteristics remain largely unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 20%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 42 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 11%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 47 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,709
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,802
of 288,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#143
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.