↓ Skip to main content

Bronchial biopsy specimen as a surrogate for DNA methylation analysis in inoperable lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bronchial biopsy specimen as a surrogate for DNA methylation analysis in inoperable lung cancer
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13148-017-0432-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang-Won Um, Hong Kwan Kim, Yujin Kim, Bo Bin Lee, Dongho Kim, Joungho Han, Hojoong Kim, Young Mog Shim, Duk-Hwan Kim

Abstract

This study was aimed at understanding whether bronchial biopsy specimen can be used as a surrogate for DNA methylation analysis in surgically resected lung cancer. A genome-wide methylation was analyzed in 42 surgically resected tumor tissues, 136 bronchial washing, 12 sputum, and 8 bronchial biopsy specimens using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, and models for prediction of lung cancer were evaluated using TCGA lung cancer data. Four thousand seven hundred and twenty-six CpGs (P < 1.0E-07) that were highly methylated in tumor tissues were identified from 42 lung cancer patients. Ten CpGs were selected for prediction of lung cancer. Genes including the 10 CpGs were classified into three categories: (i) transcription (HOXA9, SOX17, ZNF154, HOXD13); (ii) cell signaling (HBP1, SFRP1, VIPR2); and (iii) adhesion (PCDH17, ITGA5, CD34). Three logistic regression models based on the 10 CpGs classified 897 TCGA primary lung tissues with a sensitivity of 95.0~97.8% and a specificity of 97.4~98.7%. However, the classification performance of the models was very poor in bronchial washing samples: the area under the curve (AUC) was equal to 0.72~0.78. The methylation levels of the 10 CpGs in bronchial biopsy were not significantly different from those in surgically resected tumor tissues (P > 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). However, their methylation levels were significantly different between paired bronchial biopsy and washing (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The present study suggests that bronchial biopsy specimen may be used as a surrogate for DNA methylation analysis in patient with inoperable lung cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,031,309
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#497
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,338
of 440,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.