↓ Skip to main content

Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-16-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bert Molewijk, Marit Helene Hem, Reidar Pedersen

Abstract

Little is known about how health care professionals deal with ethical challenges in mental health care, especially when not making use of a formal ethics support service. Understanding this is important in order to be able to support the professionals, to improve the quality of care, and to know in which way future ethics support services might be helpful.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Psychology 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,857,207
of 11,347,519 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#240
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,509
of 253,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,347,519 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.