↓ Skip to main content

Surgical management of inverted papilloma; a single-center analysis of 247 patients with long follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical management of inverted papilloma; a single-center analysis of 247 patients with long follow-up
Published in
Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40463-017-0246-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oisín Bugter, Dominiek André Monserez, Floris Vincent Willem Joseph van Zijl, Robert Jan Baatenburg de Jong, Jose Angelito Hardillo

Abstract

Our aim was to review our management of inverted papilloma (IP), perform a recurrence analysis, and review the literature. A retrospective analysis of 247 patients treated for an IP. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach, tumor presentation (primary, residual and recurrence) and Krouse-stage. Recurrence was observed in 20.3%, 28.6% and 35.1% (p = 0.017) of the patients who underwent endoscopic, external and combined surgery, respectively. Recurrences occurred more often in residual than primary IP (36.9% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.021). Primary endoscopic surgery had a recurrence rate of 12.5%, which was comparable to the recent literature (11.2%, 161/1433). The relatively high number of recurrences in this cohort is explained by the long follow-up and previous (incomplete) surgery in 61.5% of the cases. The inferior outcome of residual IP underscores the importance of having a low threshold for preoperative biopsy in unilateral and atypical sinonasal disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 56%
Psychology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#9,848,848
of 12,330,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery
#173
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,836
of 346,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,330,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.