↓ Skip to main content

Renal cell carcinoma treated with stereotactic radiotherapy with histological change confirmed on autopsy: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renal cell carcinoma treated with stereotactic radiotherapy with histological change confirmed on autopsy: a case report
Published in
BMC Research Notes, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Onishi, Tomonori Kawasaki, Hidenori Zakoji, Takashi Yoshida, Takafumi Komiyama, Kengo Kuriyama, Masayuki Araya, Ryo Saito, Shinichi Aoki, Yoshiyasu Maehata, Licht Tominaga, Kan Marino, Iori Watanabe, Mitsuhiko Oguri, Tsutomu Araki, Nobuyuki Enomoto, Masayuki Takeda, Ryohei Katoh

Abstract

Treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma using radiotherapy with curative intent is rare, because renal cell carcinoma is generally regarded as a radiation-resistant tumor. Recently, stereotactic body radiation therapy has been radically applied for cancers in various organs including renal cell carcinoma. However, there were few reports describing pathological changes of renal cell carcinoma post stereotactic body radiation therapy. This is the first report we are aware of documenting late histological effects of stereotactic body radiation therapy on renal cell carcinoma and surrounding normal tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Other 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 47%
Engineering 5 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,249,662
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,561
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,084
of 226,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#72
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.