You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correction to: Study protocol on establishment of sentinel sites network for contraceptive and abortion trends, needs and utilization of services in Zika virus affected countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Health, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12978-017-0432-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Moazzam Ali, Kelsey Miller, Rachel Folz, Brooke Ronald Johnson, James Kiarie |
Abstract |
The original version of this article [1] unfortunately contained a mistake. All occurrences in the main text referring to the research carried out in the following countries: Brazil, Honduras and Columbia should instead be replaced with "Brazil, Honduras and Panama". The original version of this article has been updated to reflect this change. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
Mathematics | 1 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,456,235
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,331
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,067
of 440,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#49
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.