You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Three-dimensional echocardiography of congenital abnormalities of the left atrioventricular valve
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Echo Research & Practice, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1530/erp-15-0003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Rice, John Simpson |
| Abstract |
Congenital abnormalities of the left atrioventricular (AV) valve are a significant diagnostic challenge. Traditionally, reliance has been placed on two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) imaging to guide recognition of the specific morphological features. Real-time 3DE can provide unique views of the left AV valve with the potential to improve understanding of valve morphology and function to facilitate surgical planning. This review illustrates the features of congenital abnormalities of the left AV valve assessed by 3DE. The similarities and differences in morphology between different lesions are described, both with respect to the valve itself and supporting chordal apparatus. The potential advantages as well as limitations of this technique in clinical practice are outlined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 78% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,669,582
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#39
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,470
of 271,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.