You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In the interest of food safety: a qualitative study investigating communication and trust between food regulators and food industry in the UK, Australia and New Zealand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-017-4118-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha B Meyer, Annabelle M Wilson, Michael Calnan, Julie Henderson, John Coveney, Dean McCullum, Alex R Pearce, Paul Ward, Trevor Webb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#15,465
of 17,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,053
of 436,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#203
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.