↓ Skip to main content

Surgical skills simulation in trauma and orthopaedic training

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical skills simulation in trauma and orthopaedic training
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13018-014-0126-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Euan RB Stirling, Thomas L Lewis, Nicholas A Ferran

Abstract

Changing patterns of health care delivery and the rapid evolution of orthopaedic surgical techniques have made it increasingly difficult for trainees to develop expertise in their craft. Working hour restrictions and a drive towards senior led care demands that proficiency be gained in a shorter period of time whilst requiring a greater skill set than that in the past. The resulting conflict between service provision and training has necessitated the development of alternative methods in order to compensate for the reduction in `hands-on¿ experience. Simulation training provides the opportunity to develop surgical skills in a controlled environment whilst minimising risks to patient safety, operating theatre usage and financial expenditure. Many options for simulation exist within orthopaedics from cadaveric or prosthetic models, to arthroscopic simulators, to advanced virtual reality and three-dimensional software tools. There are limitations to this form of training, but it has significant potential for trainees to achieve competence in procedures prior to real-life practice. The evidence for its direct transferability to operating theatre performance is limited but there are clear benefits such as increasing trainee confidence and familiarity with equipment. With progressively improving methods of simulation available, it is likely to become more important in the ongoing and future training and assessment of orthopaedic surgeons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 47 25%
Unknown 44 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Computer Science 16 8%
Engineering 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,589,470
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#240
of 1,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,809
of 362,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.