↓ Skip to main content

Down-regulation of miR-9* in the peripheral leukocytes of Huntington’s disease patients

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Down-regulation of miR-9* in the peripheral leukocytes of Huntington’s disease patients
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13023-017-0742-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuo-Hsuan Chang, Yih-Ru Wu, Chiung-Mei Chen

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD), caused by expansion of a polyglutamine tract within HUNTINGTIN (HTT) protein, is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease associated with a progressive neurodegeneration of striatum and cerebral cortex. Although a few studies have identified substantial microRNA (miRNA) alterations in central nervous tissues from HD patients, it will be more accessible to employ these molecular changes in peripheral tissues as biomarkers for HD. We examined the expression levels of 13 miRNAs (miR-1, mirR-9, miR-9*, miR-10b, miR-29a, miR-29b, miR-124a, miR-132, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-196b, miR-330 and miR-615), 10 of which previously demonstrated alterations and 3 of which are potential regulators of differentially-expressed genes in brains of HD patients, in the peripheral leukocytes of 36 HD patients, 8 pre-symptomatic HD carriers and 28 healthy controls. We found expression levels of miR-9* was significantly lower in HD patients compared with those in healthy controls, while other miRNAs did not show significant difference between these two groups. However, there was no significant correlation between Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scales (UHDRS) and levels of miR-9* in peripheral leukocytes of HD patients. Our findings indicate the potential of miR-9* in peripheral leukocyte as a signature of neurodegeneration in HD patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Neuroscience 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,456,235
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,484
of 2,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,076
of 440,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.