↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic arterial elastance predicts mean arterial pressure decrease associated with decreasing norepinephrine dosage in septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic arterial elastance predicts mean arterial pressure decrease associated with decreasing norepinephrine dosage in septic shock
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0732-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, Eugénie Bernard, Mélanie Levrard, Hervé Dupont, Emmanuel Lorne

Abstract

IntroductionGradual reduction of the dosage of norepinephrine (NE) in patients with septic shock is usually left to the physician¿s discretion. No haemodynamic indicator predictive of the possibility of decreasing the NE dosage is currently available at the bedside. The respiratory pulse pressure variation / respiratory stroke volume variation (dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn)) ratio has been proposed as an indicator of vascular tone. The purpose of this study was to determine whether Eadyn can be used to predict the decrease in arterial pressure when decreasing the NE dosage in resuscitated septic patients.MethodsA prospective study was carried out in a university hospital intensive care unit. All consecutive patients with septic shock monitored by PICCO2 for whom the intensive care physician planned to decrease the NE dosage were enrolled. Measurements of haemodynamic and PICCO2 variables were obtained before/after decreasing the NE dosage. Responders were defined by a >15% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP).ResultsIn total 35 patients were included. MAP decreased by >15% after decreasing the NE dosage in 37% of patients (n¿=¿13). Clinical characteristics appeared to be similar between responders and non-responders. Eadyn was lower in responders than in non-responders (0.75 (0.69 to 0.85) versus 1 (0. 83 to 1.22), P <0.05). Baseline Eadyn was correlated with NE-induced MAP variations (r¿=¿0.47, P¿=¿0.005). An Eadyn less than 0.94 predicted a decrease in arterial pressure with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.72 to 0.96, P <0.0001), 100% sensitivity, and 68% specificity.ConclusionsIn septic patients treated with NE, Eadyn may predict the decrease in arterial pressure in response to NE dose reduction. Eadyn may constitute an easy-to-use functional approach to arterial tone assessment, which may be helpful to identify patients likely to benefit from NE dose reduction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Professor 8 7%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,262,161
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,038
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,789
of 395,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#250
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.