You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability of videotaped observational gait analysis in patients with orthopedic impairments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-6-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaap J Brunnekreef, Caro JT van Uden, Steven van Moorsel, Jan GM Kooloos |
| Abstract |
In clinical practice, visual gait observation is often used to determine gait disorders and to evaluate treatment. Several reliability studies on observational gait analysis have been described in the literature and generally showed moderate reliability. However, patients with orthopedic disorders have received little attention. The objective of this study is to determine the reliability levels of visual observation of gait in patients with orthopedic disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 418 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 118 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 15% |
| Researcher | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 75 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 78 | 18% |
| Engineering | 38 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 93 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,887,274
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,355
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,389
of 70,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.