↓ Skip to main content

Community based rehabilitation: a strategy for peace-building

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community based rehabilitation: a strategy for peace-building
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2002
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-2-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Boyce, Michael Koros, Jennifer Hodgson

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certain features of peace-building distinguish it from peacekeeping, and make it an appropriate strategy in dealing with vertical conflict and low intensity conflict. However, some theorists suggest that attempts, through peace-building, to impose liberal values upon non-democratic cultures are misguided and lack an ethical basis. DISCUSSION: We have been investigating the peace-building properties of community based approaches to disability in a number of countries. This paper describes the practice and impact of peace-building through Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) strategies in the context of armed conflict. The ethical basis for peace-building through practical community initiatives is explored. A number of benefits and challenges to using CBR strategies for peace-building purposes are identified. SUMMARY: During post-conflict reconstruction, disability is a powerful emotive lever that can be used to mobilize cooperation between factions. We suggest that civil society, in contrast to state-level intervention, has a valuable role in reducing the risks of conflict through community initiatives.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 39%
Arts and Humanities 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%