↓ Skip to main content

The effect of a decaffeinated green tea extract formula on fat oxidation, body composition and exercise performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
13 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of a decaffeinated green tea extract formula on fat oxidation, body composition and exercise performance
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-014-0062-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin D Roberts, Michael G Roberts, Michael D Tarpey, Jack C Weekes, Clare H Thomas

Abstract

The cardio-metabolic and antioxidant health benefits of caffeinated green tea (GT) relate to its catechin polyphenol content. Less is known about decaffeinated extracts, particularly in combination with exercise. The aim of this study was therefore to determine whether a decaffeinated green tea extract (dGTE) positively influenced fat oxidation, body composition and exercise performance in recreationally active participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#233,582
of 24,792,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#89
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,898
of 435,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#88
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,792,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.