You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proteomic signatures of serum albumin-bound proteins from stroke patients with and without endovascular closure of PFO are significantly different and suggest a novel mechanism for cholesterol efflux
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1559-0275-12-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary F Lopez, Bryan Krastins, David A Sarracino, Gregory Byram, Maryann S Vogelsang, Amol Prakash, Scott Peterman, Shadab Ahmad, Gouri Vadali, Wenjun Deng, Ignacio Inglessis, Tom Wickham, Kathleen Feeney, G William Dec, Igor Palacios, Ferdinando S Buonanno, Eng H Lo, MingMing Ning |
| Abstract |
The anatomy of PFO suggests that it can allow thrombi and potentially harmful circulatory factors to travel directly from the venous to the arterial circulation - altering circulatory phenotype. Our previous publication using high-resolution LC-MS/MS to profile protein and peptide expression patterns in plasma showed that albumin was relatively increased in donor samples from PFO-related than other types of ischemic strokes. Since albumin binds a host of molecules and acts as a carrier for lipoproteins, small molecules and drugs, we decided to investigate the albumin-bound proteins (in a similar sample cohort) in an effort to unravel biological changes and potentially discover biomarkers related to PFO-related stroke and PFO endovascular closure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,768,962
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#26
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,069
of 353,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.