You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrent breast cancer: impact and prognostic stratification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Imaging, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1470-7330-14-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandre Cochet, Steven David, Kate Moodie, Elizabeth Drummond, Gaelle Dutu, Michael MacManus, Boon Chua, Rodney J Hicks |
Abstract |
The incremental value of 18FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer (BC) compared to conventional imaging (CI) in clinical practice is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management impact and prognostic value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in this setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 26% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 47% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#445
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,854
of 241,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.