↓ Skip to main content

A prospective investigation into the clinical impact of 4D-PET/CT in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Imaging, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective investigation into the clinical impact of 4D-PET/CT in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules
Published in
Cancer Imaging, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1470-7330-14-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Callahan, Tomas Kron, Michal E Schneider, Rodney J Hicks

Abstract

While the effects of respiratory motion on measuring metabolic signal in PET/CT scanning are well known, it is still standard practice in most centres to scan patients while breathing freely with no correction for the effects of respiratory motion. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of 4D-PET/CT in classifying lesions in patients with a radiologically-indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 47%
Physics and Astronomy 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#239
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,351
of 242,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.