↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
patent
10 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2138 Mendeley
citeulike
23 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2004
DOI 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Kurtz, Adam Phillippy, Arthur L Delcher, Michael Smoot, Martin Shumway, Corina Antonescu, Steven L Salzberg

Abstract

The newest version of MUMmer easily handles comparisons of large eukaryotic genomes at varying evolutionary distances, as demonstrated by applications to multiple genomes. Two new graphical viewing tools provide alternative ways to analyze genome alignments. The new system is the first version of MUMmer to be released as open-source software. This allows other developers to contribute to the code base and freely redistribute the code. The MUMmer sources are available at http://www.tigr.org/software/mummer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 40 2%
United Kingdom 13 <1%
Germany 10 <1%
Brazil 10 <1%
Mexico 9 <1%
France 7 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
Australia 7 <1%
Denmark 6 <1%
Other 55 3%
Unknown 1974 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 577 27%
Researcher 483 23%
Student > Master 288 13%
Student > Bachelor 169 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 103 5%
Other 310 14%
Unknown 208 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1048 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 435 20%
Computer Science 140 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 65 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 2%
Other 135 6%
Unknown 271 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,613,244
of 22,331,852 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,455
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,029
of 325,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,331,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.