↓ Skip to main content

Identifying term relations cross different gene ontology categories

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying term relations cross different gene ontology categories
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1959-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiajie Peng, Honggang Wang, Junya Lu, Weiwei Hui, Yadong Wang, Xuequn Shang

Abstract

The Gene Ontology (GO) is a community-based bioinformatics resource that employs ontologies to represent biological knowledge and describes information about gene and gene product function. GO includes three independent categories: molecular function, biological process and cellular component. For better biological reasoning, identifying the biological relationships between terms in different categories are important. However, the existing measurements to calculate similarity between terms in different categories are either developed by using the GO data only or only take part of combined gene co-function network information. We propose an iterative ranking-based method called C r o G O2 to measure the cross-categories GO term similarities by incorporating level information of GO terms with both direct and indirect interactions in the gene co-function network. The evaluation test shows that C r o G O2 performs better than the existing methods. A genome-specific term association network for yeast is also generated by connecting terms with the high confidence score. The linkages in the term association network could be supported by the literature. Given a gene set, the related terms identified by using the association network have overlap with the related terms identified by GO enrichment analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Engineering 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,890
of 7,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,607
of 441,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#121
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.