↓ Skip to main content

Is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia an autophagy disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia an autophagy disease?
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13024-017-0232-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiqiang Deng, Patricia Sheehan, Shi Chen, Zhenyu Yue

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are neurodegenerative disorders that share genetic risk factors and pathological hallmarks. Intriguingly, these shared factors result in a high rate of comorbidity of these diseases in patients. Intracellular protein aggregates are a common pathological hallmark of both diseases. Emerging evidence suggests that impaired RNA processing and disrupted protein homeostasis are two major pathogenic pathways for these diseases. Indeed, recent evidence from genetic and cellular studies of the etiology and pathogenesis of ALS-FTD has suggested that defects in autophagy may underlie various aspects of these diseases. In this review, we discuss the link between genetic mutations, autophagy dysfunction, and the pathogenesis of ALS-FTD. Although dysfunction in a variety of cellular pathways can lead to these diseases, we provide evidence that ALS-FTD is, in many cases, an autophagy disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,295,791
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#588
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,801
of 441,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.