You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision making, central coherence and set-shifting: a comparison between Binge Eating Disorder, Anorexia Nervosa and Healthy Controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-015-0395-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Aloi, Marianna Rania, Mariarita Caroleo, Antonella Bruni, Antonella Palmieri, Maria Antonella Cauteruccio, Pasquale De Fazio, Cristina Segura-García |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 94 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,060,021
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,189
of 5,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,911
of 365,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#16
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.