You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-017-0822-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent, Markus Zenger, Andreas Hinz, Burghard Klapp, Elmar Brähler |
| Abstract |
There has been a marked tendency for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to shift their focus from risk to resilience. This should be assessed by comparing the outcome to a context specific reference group. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for the BRCS for different age groups for men and women and to further investigate the construct validity and factor structure in a general population. Nationally representative face-to face household surveys were conducted in Germany in 2013 (n = 2508). Normative data for the BRCS were generated for men and women (53.2% female) and different age levels (mean age (SD) of 49.7 (18.0) years). Men had significantly higher mean scores compared with women (14.9 [SD = 3.2] vs. 14.6 [SD = 3.1]). The results of the EFA and CFA clearly indicate a unidimensional solution with one factor. Furthermore, the invariance of the one-factor model was tested for the whole sample across gender and six age groups. The normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparisons of resilience with other populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,087,536
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,131
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,288
of 441,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#40
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.