You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Learning by doing in practice: a roundtable discussion about stakeholder engagement in implementation research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-017-0275-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Said Habib Arwal, Bhupinder Kaur Aulakh, Ahmed Bumba, Akshita Siddula |
| Abstract |
Researchers and policy-makers alike increasingly recognise the importance of engaging diverse perspectives in implementation research. This roundtable discussion presents the experiences and perspectives of three decision-makers regarding the benefits and challenges of their engagement in implementation research. The first perspective comes from a rural district medical officer from Uganda and touches on the success of using data as evidence in a low-resource setting. The second perspective is from an Afghani Ministry of Health expert who used a community-based approach to improving healthcare services in remote regions. Finally, the third perspective highlights the successes and trials of a policy-maker from India who offers advice on how to grow the relationship between decision-makers and researchers. Overall, the stakeholders in this roundtable discussion saw important benefits to their engagement in research. In order to facilitate greater engagement in the future, they advise on closer dialogue between researchers and policy-makers and supporting the development of capacity to stimulate and facilitate engagement in research and the use of evidence in decision-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,961,684
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,064
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,378
of 441,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.