↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 1,320)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era
Published in
BMC Surgery, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-15-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei-jie Zhang, Gui-fang Xu, Qin Huang, Kun-lun Luo, Zhi-tao Dong, Jie-ming Li, Guo-zhong Wu, Wen-xian Guan

Abstract

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for stone can be carried out by either laparoscopic transcystic stone extraction (LTSE) or laparoscopic choledochotomy (LC). It remains unknown as to which approach is optimal for management of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones (CBDS) in Chinese patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,600,202
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#29
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,887
of 352,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.