↓ Skip to main content

Cerebrovascular and amyloid pathology in predementia stages: the relationship with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebrovascular and amyloid pathology in predementia stages: the relationship with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13195-017-0328-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Bos, Frans R. Verhey, Inez H.G.B. Ramakers, Heidi I. L. Jacobs, Hilkka Soininen, Yvonne Freund-Levi, Harald Hampel, Magda Tsolaki, Åsa K. Wallin, Mark A. van Buchem, Ania Oleksik, Marcel M. Verbeek, Marcel Olde Rikkert, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Philip Scheltens, Pauline Aalten, Pieter Jelle Visser, Stephanie J. B. Vos

Abstract

Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and amyloid-β (Aβ) often coexist, but their influence on neurodegeneration and cognition in predementia stages remains unclear. We investigated the association between CVD and Aβ on neurodegenerative markers and cognition in patients without dementia. We included 271 memory clinic patients with subjective or objective cognitive deficits but without dementia from the BioBank Alzheimer Center Limburg cohort (n = 99) and the LeARN (n = 50) and DESCRIPA (n = 122) multicenter studies. CSF Aβ1-42 and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were used as measures of Aβ and CVD, respectively. Individuals were classified into four groups based on the presence (+) or absence (-) of Aβ and WMH. We investigated differences in phosphorylated tau, total tau (t-tau), and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) between groups using general linear models. We examined cognitive decline and progression to dementia using linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards models. All analyses were adjusted for study and demographics. MTA and t-tau were elevated in the Aβ - WMH+, Aβ + WMH-, and Aβ + WMH+ groups. MTA was most severe in the Aβ + WMH+ group compared with the groups with a single pathology. Both WMH and Aβ were associated with cognitive decline, but having both pathologies simultaneously was not associated with faster decline. In the present study, we found an additive association of Aβ and CVD pathology with baseline MTA but not with cognitive decline. Because our findings may have implications for diagnosis and prognosis of memory clinic patients and for future scientific research, they should be validated in a larger sample with longer follow-up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 21 26%
Psychology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 31 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,249,732
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#500
of 1,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,117
of 441,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.