↓ Skip to main content

Foam pads properties and their effects on posturography in participants of different weight

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Foam pads properties and their effects on posturography in participants of different weight
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12998-014-0045-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy Gosselin, Michael Fagan

Abstract

Foam pads are increasingly used on force platforms during balance assessments in order to produce increased instability thereby permitting the measurement of enhanced posturographic parameters. A variety of foam pads providing different material properties have thus been used, although it is still unclear which characteristics produce the most effective and reliable tests. Furthermore, the effects of participant bodyweight on the performance of the foam pads and outcome of the test are unknown. This project investigated how different foam samples affected postural sway velocity in participants of different weights.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 23%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Sports and Recreations 7 13%
Engineering 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%