You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Activating PIK3CA mutations coexist with BRAF or NRAS mutations in a limited fraction of melanomas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12967-015-0401-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antonella Manca, Amelia Lissia, Mariaelena Capone, Paolo A Ascierto, Gerardo Botti, Corrado Caracò, Ignazio Stanganelli, Maria Colombino, MariaCristina Sini, Antonio Cossu, Giuseppe Palmieri |
Abstract |
Activated PI3K-AKT pathway may contribute to decrease sensitivity to inhibitors of key pathogenetic effectors (mutated BRAF, active NRAS or MEK) in melanoma. Functional alterations are deeply involved in PI3K-AKT activation, with a minimal role reported for mutations in PIK3CA, the catalytic subunit of the PI3K gene. We here assessed the prevalence of the coexistence of BRAF/NRAS and PIK3CA mutations in a series of melanoma samples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 21% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,316,177
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,233
of 3,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,894
of 352,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#66
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.