↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in horizontal model integration

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges in horizontal model integration
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12918-016-0266-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrin Kolczyk, Carsten Conradi

Abstract

Systems Biology has motivated dynamic models of important intracellular processes at the pathway level, for example, in signal transduction and cell cycle control. To answer important biomedical questions, however, one has to go beyond the study of isolated pathways towards the joint study of interacting signaling pathways or the joint study of signal transduction and cell cycle control. Thereby the reuse of established models is preferable, as it will generally reduce the modeling effort and increase the acceptance of the combined model in the field. Obtaining a combined model can be challenging, especially if the submodels are large and/or come from different working groups (as is generally the case, when models stored in established repositories are used). To support this task, we describe a semi-automatic workflow based on established software tools. In particular, two frequent challenges are described: identification of the overlap and subsequent (re)parameterization of the integrated model. The reparameterization step is crucial, if the goal is to obtain a model that can reproduce the data explained by the individual models. For demonstration purposes we apply our workflow to integrate two signaling pathways (EGF and NGF) from the BioModels Database.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Engineering 3 19%
Mathematics 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%