↓ Skip to main content

On the phylogeny of Mustelidae subfamilies: analysis of seventeen nuclear non-coding loci and mitochondrial complete genomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the phylogeny of Mustelidae subfamilies: analysis of seventeen nuclear non-coding loci and mitochondrial complete genomes
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Yu, Dan Peng, Jiang Liu, Pengtao Luan, Lu Liang, Hang Lee, Muyeong Lee, Oliver A Ryder, Yaping Zhang

Abstract

Mustelidae, as the largest and most-diverse family of order Carnivora, comprises eight subfamilies. Phylogenetic relationships among these Mustelidae subfamilies remain argumentative subjects in recent years. One of the main reasons is that the mustelids represent a typical example of rapid evolutionary radiation and recent speciation event. Prior investigation has been concentrated on the application of different mitochondrial (mt) sequence and nuclear protein-coding data, herein we employ 17 nuclear non-coding loci (>15 kb), in conjunction with mt complete genome data (>16 kb), to clarify these enigmatic problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 164 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Other 12 7%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 53%
Environmental Science 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,246,269
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,345
of 3,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,071
of 120,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#18
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.