You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Schmeissneria: A missing link to angiosperms?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-7-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Wang, Shuying Duan, Baoyin Geng, Jinzhong Cui, Yong Yang |
| Abstract |
The origin of angiosperms has been under debate since the time of Darwin. While there has been much speculation in past decades about pre-Cretaceous angiosperms, including Archaefructus, these reports are controversial. The earliest reliable fossil record of angiosperms remains restricted to the Cretaceous, even though recent molecular phylogenetic studies suggest an origin for angiosperms much earlier than the current fossil record. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 60 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 52% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,676
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,528
of 169,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.