You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inferring phylogenies with incomplete data sets: a 5-gene, 567-taxon analysis of angiosperms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-9-61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J Gordon Burleigh, Khidir W Hilu, Douglas E Soltis |
| Abstract |
Phylogenetic analyses of angiosperm relationships have used only a small percentage of available sequence data, but phylogenetic data matrices often can be augmented with existing data, especially if one allows missing characters. We explore the effects on phylogenetic analyses of adding 378 matK sequences and 240 26S rDNA sequences to the complete 3-gene, 567-taxon angiosperm phylogenetic matrix of Soltis et al. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 91 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,870
of 116,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.