↓ Skip to main content

Quality of work life of rural emergency department nurses and physicians: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of work life of rural emergency department nurses and physicians: a pilot study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1075-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Bragard, Richard Fleet, Anne-Marie Etienne, Patrick Archambault, France Légaré, Jean-Marc Chauny, Jean-Frédéric Lévesque, Mathieu Ouimet, Julien Poitras, Gilles Dupuis

Abstract

Information about recruitment and retention factors and quality of work life (QWL) in rural emergency departments (EDs) is limited. A pilot study was used to determine the feasibility of a large-scale study of these variables in Quebec EDs. Two EDs, approximately 10,000 and 30,000 patients per year respectively, were selected as convenience samples. An online survey containing the Quality of Work Life Systemic Inventory (QWLSI; 34 items) and the Recruitment and Retention Factors Questionnaire (39 items) was sent to ED nurses and physicians of these two EDs. Descriptive statistics of percentage, mean and standard deviation and correlations were used to analyse the data. Forty out of 64 eligible workers (62%) gave their consent to participate, but only 20 had completed both questionnaires. Participants' mean age was 42 years (SD = 11.6). The average participants satisfaction with their access to continuing education was low (Mean = 1.6, SD = 0.8). However, their satisfaction with technical resources (Mean = 2.4, SD = 0.7), pre-hospital and inter-hospital transfer services (Mean = 2.5, SD = 0.6), relationships with colleagues (Mean = 2.7, SD = 0.6) and managers (Mean = 2.2, SD = 0.7), work-life balance (Mean = 2.4, SD = 0.6) and emergency patient access to other departments (Mean = 3.7, SD = 0.6) was in the average. The impact of several aspects of the rural environment (e.g. tranquility) on quality of life was also in the average (Mean = 2.5, SD = 0.7). QWL was in the average, excepted subscale 'support offered to employee' for which the QWL was lower. Data collection was difficult and the larger study will require strategies to improve recruitment such as a paper alternative. The study showed globally good recruitment and retention factors and QWL for these ED nurses and physicians. These results will help hospital administrations better plan initiatives aimed at improving retention and QWL.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 34 31%