You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Morhaf Al Achkar, Mathew Hanauer, Chantel Colavecchia, Dean A. Seehusen |
| Abstract |
The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States. A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey was completed by 233 out of 1757 program directors, which represents a response rate of 13.3%. IPE is currently being used by over 60% of the GME program directors that completed the survey. The median number of IPE hours is 60. Classroom learning (70.8%) and team-based approaches (70.1%) to patient care are the two most common forms of IPE. The two most prevalent reasons for implementing IPE are improving collaboration (92.2%) and communication (87%). More than half of the program directors agreed or strongly agreed that lack of time both for teachers (54.4) and for residents (51.5%) are barriers to IPE. About one third of the respondents whose programs do not include IPE are interested in implementing some IPE in the future. IPE in its varying formats has been implemented as a training model by many residency programs. Further studies are needed to explore the comparative effectiveness of the different modalities of IPE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| Greece | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,638,453
of 23,628,742 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#861
of 3,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,234
of 446,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#17
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,628,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.