↓ Skip to main content

Donor-host mitochondrial compatibility improves efficiency of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Developmental Biology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Donor-host mitochondrial compatibility improves efficiency of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer
Published in
BMC Developmental Biology, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-213x-10-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhong-hai Yan, Yi-ye Zhou, Jing Fu, Fei Jiao, Lei-wen Zhao, Peng-fei Guan, Shu-zhen Huang, Yi-tao Zeng, Fanyi Zeng

Abstract

The interaction between the karyoplast and cytoplast plays an important role in the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. It is generally accepted that in nuclear transfer embryos, the reprogramming of gene expression is induced by epigenetic mechanisms and does not involve modifications of DNA sequences. In cattle, oocytes with various mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotypes usually have different ATP content and can further affect the efficiency of in vitro production of embryos. As mtDNA comes from the recipient oocyte during SCNT and is regulated by genes in the donor nucleus, it is a perfect model to investigate the interaction between donor nuclei and host oocytes in SCNT.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 32%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%