You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolic and nutritional support of critically ill patients: consensus and controversies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0737-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Charles Preiser, Arthur RH van Zanten, Mette M Berger, Gianni Biolo, Michael P Casaer, Gordon S Doig, Richard D Griffiths, Daren K Heyland, Michael Hiesmayr, Gaetano Iapichino, Alessandro Laviano, Claude Pichard, Pierre Singer, Greet Van den Berghe, Jan Wernerman, Paul Wischmeyer, Jean-Louis Vincent |
| Abstract |
The results of recent large-scale clinical trials have led us to review our understanding of the metabolic response to stress and the most appropriate means of managing nutrition in critically ill patients. This review presents an update in this field, identifying and discussing a number of areas for which consensus has been reached and others where controversy remains and presenting areas for future research. We discuss optimal calorie and protein intake, the incidence and management of re-feeding syndrome, the role of gastric residual volume monitoring, the place of supplemental parenteral nutrition when enteral feeding is deemed insufficient, the role of indirect calorimetry, and potential indications for several pharmaconutrients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 14% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Mexico | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 30% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 691 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 108 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 85 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 82 | 12% |
| Other | 68 | 10% |
| Researcher | 66 | 9% |
| Other | 139 | 20% |
| Unknown | 153 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 308 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 109 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 60 | 9% |
| Unknown | 172 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,047,383
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#803
of 6,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,189
of 397,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.