↓ Skip to main content

The role of beta-lactamase-producing-bacteria in mixed infections

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of beta-lactamase-producing-bacteria in mixed infections
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-9-202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Itzhak Brook

Abstract

Beta-lactamase-producing bacteria (BLPB) can play an important role in polymicrobial infections. They can have a direct pathogenic impact in causing the infection as well as an indirect effect through their ability to produce the enzyme beta-lactamase. BLPB may not only survive penicillin therapy but can also, as was demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo studies, protect other penicillin-susceptible bacteria from penicillin by releasing the free enzyme into their environment. This phenomenon occurs in upper respiratory tract, skin, soft tissue, surgical and other infections. The clinical, in vitro, and in vivo evidence supporting the role of these organisms in the increased failure rate of penicillin in eradication of these infections and the implication of that increased rate on the management of infections is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Uzbekistan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 22%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,411,787
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,004
of 7,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,848
of 164,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.