↓ Skip to main content

Plasma virome of cattle from forest region revealed diverse small circular ssDNA viral genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma virome of cattle from forest region revealed diverse small circular ssDNA viral genomes
Published in
Virology Journal, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12985-018-0923-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Wang, Shouxin Li, Asif Mahmood, Shixing Yang, Xiaochun Wang, Quan Shen, Tongling Shan, Xutao Deng, Jingjiao Li, Xiuguo Hua, Li Cui, Eric Delwart, Wen Zhang

Abstract

Free-range cattle are common in the Northeast China area, which have close contact with farmers and may carry virus threatening to cattle and farmers. Using viral metagenomics we analyzed the virome in plasma samples collected from 80 cattle from the forested region of Northeast China. The virome of cattle plasma is composed of the viruses belonging to the families including Parvoviridae, Papillomaviridae, Picobirnaviridae, and divergent viral genomes showing sequence similarity to circular Rep-encoding single stranded (CRESS) DNA viruses. Five such CRESS-DNA genomes were full characterized, with Rep sequences related to circovirus and gemycircularvirus. Three bovine parvoviruses belonging to two different genera were also characterized. The virome in plasma samples of cattle from the forested region of Northeast China was revealed, which further characterized the diversity of viruses in cattle plasma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 11%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,964,325
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,834
of 3,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,795
of 473,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.