You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke: dawn of a new era?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12883-017-1007-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonu Bhaskar, Peter Stanwell, Dennis Cordato, John Attia, Christopher Levi |
| Abstract |
Following the success of recent endovascular trials, endovascular therapy has emerged as an exciting addition to the arsenal of clinical management of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In this paper, we present an extensive overview of intravenous and endovascular reperfusion strategies, recent advances in AIS neurointervention, limitations of various treatment paradigms, and provide insights on imaging-guided reperfusion therapies. A roadmap for imaging guided reperfusion treatment workflow in AIS is also proposed. Both systemic thrombolysis and endovascular treatment have been incorporated into the standard of care in stroke therapy. Further research on advanced imaging-based approaches to select appropriate patients, may widen the time-window for patient selection and would contribute immensely to early thrombolytic strategies, better recanalization rates, and improved clinical outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Italy | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 105 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,375,441
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#230
of 2,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,507
of 446,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.