You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis, treatment, and response assessment in solitary plasmacytoma: updated recommendations from a European Expert Panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13045-017-0549-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Caers, B. Paiva, E. Zamagni, X. Leleu, J. Bladé, S. Y. Kristinsson, C. Touzeau, N. Abildgaard, E. Terpos, R. Heusschen, E. Ocio, M. Delforge, O. Sezer, M. Beksac, H. Ludwig, G. Merlini, P. Moreau, S. Zweegman, M. Engelhardt, L. Rosiñol |
| Abstract |
Solitary plasmacytoma is an infrequent form of plasma cell dyscrasia that presents as a single mass of monoclonal plasma cells, located either extramedullary or intraosseous. In some patients, a bone marrow aspiration can detect a low monoclonal plasma cell infiltration which indicates a high risk of early progression to an overt myeloma disease. Before treatment initiation, whole body positron emission tomography-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude the presence of additional malignant lesions. For decades, treatment has been based on high-dose radiation, but studies exploring the potential benefit of systemic therapies for high-risk patients are urgently needed. In this review, a panel of expert European hematologists updates the recommendations on the diagnosis and management of patients with solitary plasmacytoma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 67 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 73 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,311,379
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#171
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,246
of 443,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.