↓ Skip to main content

Establishing a China malaria diagnosis reference laboratory network for malaria elimination

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing a China malaria diagnosis reference laboratory network for malaria elimination
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0556-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian-hai Yin, He Yan, Fang Huang, Mei Li, Hui-hui Xiao, Shui-sen Zhou, Zhi-gui Xia

Abstract

BackgroundIn China, the prevalence of cases from malaria has reduced dramatically due to the malaria elimination programme. The continued success of the programme will depend upon the accurate diagnosis of the disease in the laboratory. The basic requirements for this are a reliable malaria diagnosis laboratory network, quality management system to support case verification and source tracking.MethodsThe baseline information of provincial malaria laboratories in the China malaria diagnosis reference laboratory network was collected and analysed, and a quality-assurance activity was carried out to assess the accuracy of malaria diagnosis by microscopy using WHO standards and PCR.ResultsAt the end of 2013, 19 of 24 provincial laboratories were included in the network. In total, 168 laboratory staff registered in the study and there was no bias in their age, gender, education level, and position. The staff generally identified Plasmodium species with great accuracy by microscopy and PCR. However, Plasmodium ovale was likely to be misdiagnosed as Plasmodium vivax by microscopy.ConclusionsChina has established a laboratory network for primary malaria diagnosis. However, this network should cover a larger area. Currently, Plasmodium species can be identified fairly accurately by microscopy and PCR. However, laboratory staff need additional training to accurately identify P. ovale microscopically and perform PCR operations for future quality control activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 20 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 26 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,422,213
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,513
of 5,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,807
of 352,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#48
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.