↓ Skip to main content

Predicting invasive breast cancer versus DCIS in different age groups

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting invasive breast cancer versus DCIS in different age groups
Published in
BMC Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-584
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehmet US Ayvaci, Oguzhan Alagoz, Jagpreet Chhatwal, Alejandro Munoz del Rio, Edward A Sickles, Houssam Nassif, Karla Kerlikowske, Elizabeth S Burnside

Abstract

Increasing focus on potentially unnecessary diagnosis and treatment of certain breast cancers prompted our investigation of whether clinical and mammographic features predictive of invasive breast cancer versus ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) differ by age.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 18%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Mathematics 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,060
of 8,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,024
of 230,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#35
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.