You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Floral gene resources from basal angiosperms for comparative genomics research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-5-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victor A Albert, Douglas E Soltis, John E Carlson, William G Farmerie, P Kerr Wall, Daniel C Ilut, Teri M Solow, Lukas A Mueller, Lena L Landherr, Yi Hu, Matyas Buzgo, Sangtae Kim, Mi-Jeong Yoo, Michael W Frohlich, Rafael Perl-Treves, Scott E Schlarbaum, Barbara J Bliss, Xiaohong Zhang, Steven D Tanksley, David G Oppenheimer, Pamela S Soltis, Hong Ma, Claude W dePamphilis, James H Leebens-Mack |
| Abstract |
The Floral Genome Project was initiated to bridge the genomic gap between the most broadly studied plant model systems. Arabidopsis and rice, although now completely sequenced and under intensive comparative genomic investigation, are separated by at least 125 million years of evolutionary time, and cannot in isolation provide a comprehensive perspective on structural and functional aspects of flowering plant genome dynamics. Here we discuss new genomic resources available to the scientific community, comprising cDNA libraries and Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) sequences for a suite of phylogenetically basal angiosperms specifically selected to bridge the evolutionary gaps between model plants and provide insights into gene content and genome structure in the earliest flowering plants. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 12% |
| Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#398
of 3,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,078
of 74,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them