Title |
Generalized estimation of the ventilatory distribution from the multiple-breath washout: a bench evaluation study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12938-018-0442-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gabriel Casulari Motta-Ribeiro, Frederico Caetano Jandre, Hermann Wrigge, Antonio Giannella-Neto |
Abstract |
The multiple-breath washout (MBW) is able to provide information about the distribution of ventilation-to-volume (v/V) ratios in the lungs. However, the classical, all-parallel model may return skewed results due to the mixing effect of a common dead space. The aim of this work is to examine whether a novel mathematical model and algorithm is able to estimate v/V of a physical model, and to compare its results with those of the classical model. The novel model takes into account a dead space in series with the parallel ventilated compartments, allows for variable tidal volume (VT) and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and does not require a ideal step change of the inert gas concentration. Two physical models with preset v/V units and a common series dead space (vd) were built and mechanically ventilated. The models underwent MBW with N2 as inert gas, throughout which flow and N2 concentration signals were acquired. Distribution of v/V was estimated-via nonnegative least squares, with Tikhonov regularization-with the classical, all-parallel model (with and without correction for non-ideal inspiratory N2 step) and with the new, generalized model including breath-by-breath vd estimates given by the Fowler method (with and without constrained VT and EELV). The v/V distributions estimated with constrained EELV and VT by the generalized model were practically coincident with the actual v/V distribution for both physical models. The v/V distributions calculated with the classical model were shifted leftwards and broader as compared to the reference. The proposed model and algorithm provided better estimates of v/V than the classical model, particularly with constrained VT and EELV. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
Engineering | 2 | 17% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |