You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pallavi Latthe, Manish Latthe, Lale Say, Metin Gülmezoglu, Khalid S Khan |
| Abstract |
Health care planning for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), an important cause of morbidity amongst women is hampered due to lack of clear collated summaries of its basic epidemiological data. We systematically reviewed worldwide literature on the prevalence of different types of CPP to assess the geographical distribution of data, and to explore sources of variation in its estimates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 536 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 96 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 8% |
| Researcher | 38 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 115 | 21% |
| Unknown | 180 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 177 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 68 | 12% |
| Psychology | 27 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 64 | 12% |
| Unknown | 189 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,178,900
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,273
of 14,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,858
of 65,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.