↓ Skip to main content

The effect of twin-to-twin delivery time intervals on neonatal outcome for second twins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of twin-to-twin delivery time intervals on neonatal outcome for second twins
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12884-018-1668-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Lindroos, A. Elfvin, L. Ladfors, U.-B. Wennerholm

Abstract

The objective was to examine the effect of twin-to-twin delivery intervals on neonatal outcome for second twins. This was a retrospective, hospital-based study, performed at a university teaching hospital in Western Sweden. Twin deliveries between 2008 and 2014 at ≥32 + 0 weeks of gestation, where the first twin was delivered vaginally, were included. Primary outcome was a composite outcome of metabolic acidosis, Apgar < 4 at 5 min or peri/neonatal mortality in the second twin. Secondary outcome was a composite outcome of neonatal morbidity. A total of 527 twin deliveries were included. The median twin-to-twin delivery interval time was 19 min (range 2-399 min) and 68% of all second twins were delivered within 30 min. Primary outcome occurred in 2.6% of the second twins. Median twin-to-twin delivery interval was 34 min (8-78 min) for the second twin with a primary outcome, and 19 min (2-399 min) for the second twin with no primary outcome (p = 0.028). Second twins delivered within a twin-to-twin interval of 0-30 min had a higher pH in umbilical artery blood gas than those delivered after 30 min (pH 7.23 and pH 7.20, p <  0.0001). Secondary outcome was not associated with twin-to-twin delivery interval time. The combined vaginal-cesarean delivery rate was 6.6% (n = 35) and the rate was higher with twin-to-twin delivery interval >  30 min (p <  0.0001). An association, but not necessarily a causality, between twin-to-twin delivery interval and primary outcome was seen. An upper time limit on twin-to-twin delivery time intervals may be justified. However, the optimal time interval needs further studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Linguistics 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,012,926
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,180
of 4,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,137
of 451,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#61
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.