↓ Skip to main content

Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiu-Ping Zhang, Kang Wang, Nan Li, Cheng-Qian Zhong, Xu-Biao Wei, Yu-Qiang Cheng, Yu-Zhen Gao, Han Wang, Shu-Qun Cheng

Abstract

No consensus treatment has been reached for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been recommended as effective options, but which is better remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of HR and TACE for HCC with PVTT patients. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched for comparing HR and TACE treating PVTT. Twelve retrospective studies with 3129 patients were included. A meta-analysis of 11 studies suggested that the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.41-0.57, I2 = 37%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.12-0.38, I2 = 43%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.28-0.44, I2 = 53%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14-0.54, I2 = 72%, P = 0.0001, respectively) favored HR over TACE. In a subgroup analysis, HR had better 1-, 2-,3, 5-year OS for type I PVTT (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.17-0.64, I2 = 20%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.16-0.63, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09-0.36, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01-0.32, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0006, respectively) and better 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for type II PVTT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20-0.70, I2 = 59%, P = 0.002; OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.13-0.39, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.03-0.91; I2 = 51%, P = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference in 1-, 3-, or 5-year OS between HR and TACE for type III PVTT (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.61-1.21, I2 = 0%, P = 0.39; OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.42-1.64, I2 = 0%, P = 0.59; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.06--6.04, I2 = 65%, P = 0.66, respectively). HR may lead to longer OS for some selected HCC patients with PVTT than TACE, especially for type I or II PVTT, with less difference being observed for type III or IV PVTT.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%