↓ Skip to main content

Score risk model for predicting severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome mortality

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Score risk model for predicting severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome mortality
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-2111-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Wang, Zhiqiang Zou, Chunguo Hou, Xiangzhong Liu, Fen Jiang, Hong Yu

Abstract

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging epidemic infectious disease with high mortality in East Aisa, especially in China. To predict the prognosis of SFTS precisely is important in clinical practice. From May 2013 to November 2015, 233 suspected SFTS patients were tested for SFTS virus using RT-PCR. Cox regression model was utilized to comfirm independent risk factors for mortality. A risk score model for mortality was constructed based on regression coefficient of risk factors. Log-rank test was used to evaluate the significance of this model. One hundred seventy-four patients were confirmed with SFTS, of which 40 patients died (23%). Baseline age, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and serum creatinine (sCr) level were independent risk factors of mortality. The area under ROC curve (AUCs) of these parameters for predicting death were 0.771, 0.797 and 0.764, respectively. And hazard ratio (HR) were 1.128, 1.002 and 1.013, respectively. The cutoff value of the risk model was 10. AUC of the model for predicting mortality was 0.892, with sensitivity and specificity of 82.5 and 86.6%, respectively. Log-rank test indicated strong statistical significance (×(2) = 88.35, p < 0.001). This risk score model may be helpful to predicting the prognosis of SFTS patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 7 29%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%