You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The apelinergic system as an alternative to catecholamines in low-output septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-1942-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Coquerel, Xavier Sainsily, Lauralyne Dumont, Philippe Sarret, Éric Marsault, Mannix Auger-Messier, Olivier Lesur |
| Abstract |
Catecholamines, in concert with fluid resuscitation, have long been recommended in the management of septic shock. However, not all patients respond positively and controversy surrounding the efficacy-to-safety profile of catecholamines has emerged, trending toward decatecholaminization. Contextually, it is time to re-examine the "maintaining blood pressure" paradigm by identifying safer and life-saving alternatives. We put in perspective the emerging and growing knowledge on a promising alternative avenue: the apelinergic system. This target exhibits invaluable pleiotropic properties, including inodilator activity, cardio-renal protection, and control of fluid homeostasis. Taken together, its effects are expected to be greatly beneficial for patients in septic shock. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Japan | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 30% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,340,273
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,152
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,266
of 451,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#45
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.