You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
|
---|---|
Published in |
Virology Journal, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-8-98 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lieselot Houspie, Sarah De Coster, Els Keyaerts, Phouthalack Narongsack, Rikka De Roy, Ive Talboom, Maura Sisk, Piet Maes, Jannick Verbeeck, Marc Van Ranst |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 35% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 7% |
Engineering | 5 | 7% |
Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,780,115
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#472
of 3,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,100
of 110,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#14
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.